cpufreq: governor: Change confusing struct field and variable names
The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be the
current value of jiffies_64 in some cases, for example).
Moreover, the names of some related variables in dbs_update() take
that confusion further.
Rename all of those things to make their names reflect the purpose
more accurately. While at it, drop unnecessary parens from one of
the updated expressions.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 095f91c..eb2fdbd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
for_each_cpu(j, policy_dbs->policy->cpus) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
- j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall,
+ j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_update_time,
dbs_data->io_is_busy);
if (dbs_data->ignore_nice_load)
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
@@ -137,14 +137,14 @@
/* Get Absolute Load */
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
- u64 cur_wall_time, cur_idle_time;
- unsigned int idle_time, wall_time;
+ u64 update_time, cur_idle_time;
+ unsigned int idle_time, time_elapsed;
unsigned int load;
- cur_idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &cur_wall_time, io_busy);
+ cur_idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &update_time, io_busy);
- wall_time = cur_wall_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall;
- j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall = cur_wall_time;
+ time_elapsed = update_time - j_cdbs->prev_update_time;
+ j_cdbs->prev_update_time = update_time;
idle_time = cur_idle_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle;
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = cur_nice;
}
- if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time))
+ if (unlikely(!time_elapsed || time_elapsed < idle_time))
continue;
/*
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
*
* Detecting this situation is easy: the governor's utilization
* update handler would not have run during CPU-idle periods.
- * Hence, an unusually large 'wall_time' (as compared to the
+ * Hence, an unusually large 'time_elapsed' (as compared to the
* sampling rate) indicates this scenario.
*
* prev_load can be zero in two cases and we must recalculate it
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
* - during long idle intervals
* - explicitly set to zero
*/
- if (unlikely(wall_time > (2 * sampling_rate) &&
+ if (unlikely(time_elapsed > 2 * sampling_rate &&
j_cdbs->prev_load)) {
load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@
*/
j_cdbs->prev_load = 0;
} else {
- load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time;
+ load = 100 * (time_elapsed - idle_time) / time_elapsed;
j_cdbs->prev_load = load;
}
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
- j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall, io_busy);
+ j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_update_time, io_busy);
/*
* Make the first invocation of dbs_update() compute the load.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 3e0eb7c..34eb214b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
/* Per cpu structures */
struct cpu_dbs_info {
u64 prev_cpu_idle;
- u64 prev_cpu_wall;
+ u64 prev_update_time;
u64 prev_cpu_nice;
/*
* Used to keep track of load in the previous interval. However, when