cpufreq: don't print value of .driver_data from core
CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is
completely driver specific. This can contain any value and not only
indexes. For most of the drivers, which aren't using this field, its
value is zero. So, printing this from core doesn't make any sense.
Don't print it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 65a4770..53ff3c20 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@
&& table[i].driver_data == CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ)
continue;
- pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz, %u driver_data\n",
- i, freq, table[i].driver_data);
+ pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
if (freq < min_freq)
min_freq = freq;
if (freq > max_freq)
@@ -175,8 +174,8 @@
} else
*index = optimal.driver_data;
- pr_debug("target is %u (%u kHz, %u)\n", *index, table[*index].frequency,
- table[*index].driver_data);
+ pr_debug("target index is %u, freq is:%u kHz\n", *index,
+ table[*index].frequency);
return 0;
}