arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path. The locks and unlocks are
balanced in other functions, so it seems that the same should be the case
here.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@
* spin_lock(E1,...);
<+... when != E1
if (...) {
... when != E1
* return ...;
}
...+>
* spin_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index fa5a1474..8a9aaa8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -1487,6 +1487,7 @@
struct protection_domain *domain)
{
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data, *alias_data;
+ int ret;
dev_data = get_dev_data(dev);
alias_data = get_dev_data(dev_data->alias);
@@ -1498,13 +1499,14 @@
spin_lock(&domain->lock);
/* Some sanity checks */
+ ret = -EBUSY;
if (alias_data->domain != NULL &&
alias_data->domain != domain)
- return -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
if (dev_data->domain != NULL &&
dev_data->domain != domain)
- return -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
/* Do real assignment */
if (dev_data->alias != dev) {
@@ -1520,10 +1522,14 @@
atomic_inc(&dev_data->bind);
+ ret = 0;
+
+out_unlock:
+
/* ready */
spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
/*