mm: fix clear_page_dirty_for_io vs fault race
Fix msync data loss and (less importantly) dirty page accounting
inaccuracies due to the race remaining in clear_page_dirty_for_io().
The deleted comment explains what the race was, and the added comments
explain how it is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 886ea0d..e624827 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -918,6 +918,8 @@
{
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+
if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
/*
* Yes, Virginia, this is indeed insane.
@@ -943,14 +945,19 @@
* We basically use the page "master dirty bit"
* as a serialization point for all the different
* threads doing their things.
- *
- * FIXME! We still have a race here: if somebody
- * adds the page back to the page tables in
- * between the "page_mkclean()" and the "TestClearPageDirty()",
- * we might have it mapped without the dirty bit set.
*/
if (page_mkclean(page))
set_page_dirty(page);
+ /*
+ * We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
+ * installing a dirty pte and marking the page dirty
+ * at this point. We do this by having them hold the
+ * page lock at some point after installing their
+ * pte, but before marking the page dirty.
+ * Pages are always locked coming in here, so we get
+ * the desired exclusion. See mm/memory.c:do_wp_page()
+ * for more comments.
+ */
if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
return 1;