tree 1126f18b7accec717e1fc6d4862fa344a6d0a1b5
parent 188af070d4d20474cba4d42b4eaf728ba116f418
author Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> 1474922654 +0100
committer Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> 1475562187 +0200

drm: Convert prime dma-buf <-> handle to rbtree

Currently we use a linear walk to lookup a handle and return a dma-buf,
and vice versa. A long overdue TODO task is to convert that to a
hashtable. Since the initial implementation of dma-buf/prime, we now
have resizeable hashtables we can use (and now a future task is to RCU
enable the lookup!). However, this patch opts to use an rbtree instead
to provide O(lgN) lookups (and insertion, deletion). rbtrees were chosen
over using the RCU backed resizable hashtable to firstly avoid the
reallocations (rbtrees can be embedded entirely within the parent
struct) and to favour simpler code with predictable worst case
behaviour. In simple testing, the difference between using the constant
lookup and insertion of the rhashtable and the rbtree was less than 10%
of the wall time (igt/benchmarks/prime_lookup) - both are dramatic
improvements over the existing linear lists.

v2: Favour rbtree over rhashtable

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94631
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160926204414.23222-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk